To What Extent Is There a Democratic Deficit in the Uk?

G everywherenment & Politics Es opine To what extent is at that place a representative famine in the UK? at that place is an argument that the political relation has the power and right to change laws and represent nation without necessarily having to be elective. This stub also be known as Democratic shortfall. An example of democratic dearth is the category of Lords. The members in the star sign of Lords arent elected still they involve to come to laws and represent the great deal. The members in House of Lords are usually crapn their seats hereditarily so many citizenry found it unsportsmanlike that theyre non elected into the Parliament but they female genital organ make finales and laws on our behalf.On the other hand, people whitethorn contest with the occurrence that in that location is the House of Commons as well as the House of Lords and the House of Commons has more power than the House of Lords has. H of C layabout make laws and policies without consulting H of L, whereas H of L has to unite H of C with the policy or law they want to pass. in that respect has also been several(prenominal) sort of reform in the H of L to make it fairer, there are only 92 hereditary lords leftfield in the H of L so people whitethorn say this is an example of the UK not beingness a democratic deficit. In this analyze I will be assessing for and against views of the UK being a democratic deficit. more or less people agree with this view that there is a democratic deficit in the UK because as I menti integrityd earlier the members in House of Lords arent elected, the lead of state (Queen) can decide whether or not laws can be passed and practiced in the UK but shes not elected and can reign as long as she stays a drop dead for which some people find unfair because the laws she passes affects them. Another example of Democratic deficit is the europiuman Union who makes regulations and decisions that has an effect on all the countries acro ss Europe which includes the UK.Some people think this is unfair because they make decisions that affect the way we live in the UK and they booknt stock-still been elected to do so however others may say that they may not be elected but they do make laws and decisions that help the UK such as health, education, companionable security and social services. The EU being an example of democratic deficit can be argued both ways one being sorry for people because they can make laws that the people dont equivalent but they have to follow them regardless and the other being the fact that the EU makes laws that helps the country as a whole such as education and health.Judges can be said to be an example of democratic deficit because they arent elected by the people but they can make decisions that affect peoples lives. Judges can cipher a verdict, they can interpret and apply the law and they can even make laws in some cases and all without even being elected. Some people may see this as unfair because judges can be biased and judgemental and sentence someone to more years than they merit because they know that they cant be fired.However, some people may disagree with this because judges do whats best for the society and for the people and if they didnt sentence harshly or fairly, criminals would be out in the public repeating their acts. However, some people may argue against this by saying that there are juries there in the court to make sure that the sentencing is fair and the trial isnt sabotaged or biased. Juries also give their verdict on how they found the criminal/defendant so the decision isnt fully dependent on the judge. Low participation range in the UK are one of the features of democratic deficit.In the 2010 general elections more than 16 million% of people could have voted but chose not to. The overall articulated lorry in the UK as a whole was 65%. In 2005 the vote turnout was 61% approximately, which means over a period of 5 years the percent age has risen by 4% over the UK. This shows that there is an in fact low participation rate in the UK and this is payable to situations such as First knightly the Post. On the other hand, others may disagree because the turnout of participation has change magnitude in the last 2 general elections. In 2001 the overall turnout of participation was 59%, and in 2005 the overall turnout of participation was 61%.This shows that the participation in the UK is rising. There is also some other forms of participation in the UK that have increased such as boycotting, petitions etc. These have gone up over the past years with more people becoming more concerned in politics. FPTP is an electoral voting system based on constituencies, for a party to win a general election outright they must(prenominal) win an absolute majority of constituencies. FPTP is used for elections to the House of Commons. FPTP has some advantages standardised the results can be calculated quickly and makes the trans fer of power from one party to another much easier.However, it also has some disadvantages like small parties are disadvantaged because the issuing of votes they get isnt reflected in the number of seats they gain. Also, tactical voting which is not voting for a preferred party but to defeat a bad party or to vote for a least bad one will compel more likely and there will be wasted votes which is a vote that doesnt affect the outcome of the election either because its for a losing candidate or because a candidate already has tons of votes which can lead to voter apathy.This can be seen as unfair because third parties are usually disadvantaged because of the number of seats they get compared to the number of votes and because some voters votes may not be counted because it is for the losing candidate or because the candidate already has enough votes. This gives voters reason to tactically vote instead. As you can see throughout the essay there have been a lot of arguments for an d against the view that the UK is becoming a democratic deficit.However, for arguments have seemed to outstrip against arguments by a cm. We have heard that House of Lords not being elected, the Head of State, The EU, Judges, Low participation rates and voting turnouts, and First Past the Past have all been examples of why there is a democratic deficit in the UK, while Juries, Increased turnout rates, Forms of participation increased, House of Commons, and reform of House of Lords have all been examples of why there isnt a democratic deficit in the UK.In my opinion, I think that the UK does have a democratic deficit and my reasons for thinking so are revealed in this essay. I think the UK does have a democratic deficit in the UK but it only has it to a certain extent which is where the arguments against it balance it to not make it a democratic deficit.